The use of the term “Atheist” (ἄθεος) by bishop Eusebius of Cesaria in the apologetic treatise “Preparation for the Gospel” against Hellenic phylosophy

Authors

  • Dmitrii Yu. Degtiarev, Priest, PhD Student Department of Theological Disciplines Sretensky Theological Academy Sretensky Theological Academy, building 3, Bolshaya Lubyanka Street Moscow 19107031 Автор https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-2699

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51216/2687-072X_2023_3_39-57

Keywords:

Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea, apologetics, philosophy, Hellenes, Ancient Greece, godlessness, atheism, Preparation for the Gospel

Abstract

The article discusses the use of the term “atheist” (ἄθεος) in the apologetic treatise “Preparation for the Gospel” in relation to Hellenic philosophy and its representatives. In the treatise, this term is used not only in relation to Hellenic philosophy, but also to pagan religion in general. Accusing Hellenic pagan materialist philosophers of atheism and characterizing Hellenic philosophy as impious and “godless superstition”, Eusebius uses this term mainly in the sense of ignorance of the true and only God. Contrasting materialism and pagan polytheism with faith in the one God of such thinkers as Plato and Socrates, authoritative for the Hellenic pagan society, the bishop of Caesarea draws attention to the fact that Christians similarly believe in one God. Eusebius considers the accusations of godlessness leveled against Socrates, Protagoras, and Anaxagoras. Explaining the groundlessness of these accusations against these philosophers, the apologist points to the superficiality and inconsistency of the accusations of godlessness from the Hellenic pagans, which they address not only to Christians, but also to their philosophers. The paper presents an analysis of the argumentation and apologetic methods of Bishop Eusebius regarding the semantic use of the term “atheist”. The perception and use of this term is considered not only in his works, but also in the works of other authors cited by him, including Hellenic philosophers. The contribution of the bishop of Caesarea to the semantic development of the mentioned term and its transformation is shown.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Болотов, В.В.Лекции по истории Древней Церкви. В 4 т. Т. 2. История Церкви в период до Константина Великого / В. В. Болотов ; под ред. [и с предисл.] А. Бриллиантова. – Санкт-Петербург : Тип. М. Меркушева, 1910. – 474 с.

2. Harnack A. The Mission and Expansion of Christianity in the First Three Centuries. – Grand Rapids, MI : Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 2005. – 436 p.

3. Gifford E. H. Preface to the online edition “Eusebius of Caesarea: Praeparatio evangelica (Preparation for the Gospel)”. – URL: http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/eusebius_pe_00_eintro.htm (дата обращения: 22.02.2023).

4. Wilamowitz-Möllendorf. Ein Bruchstück aus des Schrift Porphiyrius gegen die Christen // Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der Älteren Kirche. – 1900. – Bd. 1.

5. Frede, M. Eusebius’ Apoloetic Writings // Apologetics in the Roman Empire : Pagans, Jews, and Christians. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1999. – P. 223–250.

6. Johnson, A. P. Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica as Literary Experiment // Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism. Abingdon : Routledge, 2016. – Р. 67–91.

7. Морескини, К. История патристической философии / Клаудио Морескини. – Москва : Греко-латинский кабинет Ю. А. Шичалина, 2011. – 864 с. – ISBN 975-5-87245-170-9.

8. Laurin, J. R. Orientations maîtresses des apologistes chrétiens de 270 361. – Rome : Gregorian Biblical BookShop, 1954. – 487 p.

9. Obbink, D. The Atheism of Epicurus // Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies. – 1989. – № 30. – Р. 187–223.

10. Дружинин А., свящ. Жизнь и труды св. Дионисия Великого, епископа Александрийского / священник А. Дружинин. – Санкт-Петербург : Издательство Олега Абышко, 2007. – 352 с. – ISBN 5-89740-154-3.

11. Drachmann, A. B. Atheism in Pagan Antiquity. – London [etc.] : Gyldendal, 1922. – 172 p.

12. Bullivant, S., Ruse, M. The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. – Oxford : OUP, 2013. – 784 p.

13. Дегтярёв Д. Ю., свящ. Методологический замысел использования понятий «эллины», «евреи», «христиане» в трактате Евсевия Кесарийского «Евангельское Приуготовление» / священник Дегтярёв Дмитрий Юрьевич // Вестник Омской православной духовной семинарии. – 2022. – №1 (12). – С. 29–38.

14. Johnson, А. Р. Ethnicity and Argument in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica. – New York : Oxford University Press Inc., 2006. – 280 p.

15. Gallagher, E. Eusebius the Apologist : The Evidence of the Preparation and the Proof // Studia Patristica. – 1993. – № 26. – P. 251–260.

16. Young, F. Greek Apologists of the Second Century // Apologetics in the Roman Empire / eds. M. J. Edwards, M. Goodman, and S. Price. – Oxford, 1999. – Р. 81–104.

17. Античная философия : энциклопедический словарь. – Москва : Прогресс-Традиция, 2008. – 895 с. – ISBN: 5-89826-309-0.

18. Burnet, J. Early Greek philosophy. – 3rd edition. – London : Adam & Charles Black, 1920. – 389 p.

19. Bremmer, J. N. Atheism in Antiquity // The Cambridge Companion to Atheism / ed. by M. Martin. – Cambridge : CUP, 2007. – P. 11–26.

20. Казарян, А. Т. Атеизм / А. Т. Казарян // Православная энциклопедия. – Москва : Церковно-научный центр «Православная энциклопедия», 2001. – Т. 3. – ISBN 5-89572-008-0. – С. 660–670.

21. Доброцветов, П.К.Блаженный Феодорит Кирский (393–466). Лечение эллинских недугов. Слово X.Об истинных и ложных оракулах / Доброцветов Павел Кириллович // Сретенский сборник.– 2019.–№ 9/10.–С. 7–46.

22. Доброцветов, П.К. Блаженный Феодорит Кирский. Слово XII «О деятельной добродетели» из трактата «Лечение эллинских недугов» / Доброцветов Павел Кириллович. – DOI: 10.54700/diakrisis.2019.4.4.003 // Диакрисис. – 2019. – № 4 (4). – С. 60–83.

23. Доброцветов, П. К. Блаженный Феодорит Кирский и его Слово IV «О материи и космосе» из трактата «Лечение эллинских недугов» / Доброцветов Павел Кириллович. – DOI: 10/21638/spbu28.2019.308 // Вопросы теологии. – 2019. – Т. 1, № 3. – С. 441–443.

REFERENCES

1. Bolotov V. V.Lektsii po istorii Drevnei Tserkvi [Lectures on the history of the Ancient Church]. St. Petersburg, M. Merkusheva Publ., 1910, vol. 2 The history of the Church in the period before Constantine the Great, 474 p. (In Russian).

2. Harnack A. The Mission and Expansion of Christianity in the First Three Centuries. Grand Rapids, MI, Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 2005, 436 p. (In English).

3. Gifford E. H. Preface to the online edition “Eusebius of Caesarea: Praeparatio evangelica (Preparation for the Gospel)”. (In English). Available at: http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/eusebius_pe_00_eintro.htm (accessed 22.02.2023). 4. Wilamowitz‑Möllendorf. Ein Bruchstück aus des Schrift Porphiyrius gegen die Christen. Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der Älteren Kirche. 1900. Bd. 1. (In German).

5. Frede M. Eusebius’ Apologetic Writings. Apologetics in the Roman Em-pire: Pagans, Jews, and Christians. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 1999, pp. 223‑250. (In English).

6. Johnson A. P. Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica as Literary Experi‑ment. Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism.Abingdon, Routledge Publ., 2016, pp. 67–91. (In English).

7. Moreschini K. Istoriya patristicheskoi filisofii [History of patristic phi‑losophy]. Moscow, Greek‑ Latin Study of Yu. A. Shichalin Publ., 2011, 864 p. (In Russian).

8. Laurin J. R. Orientations maîtresses des apologistes chrétiens de 270 a 361. Rome, Gregorian Biblical BookShop Publ., 1954, 487 p. (In French).

9. Obbink D. The Atheism of Epicurus. Greek Roman and Byzantine Stud-ies. 1989, no. 30, pp. 187‑223. (In English).

10. Druzhinin A., priest Zhizn’ i trudy sv. Dionisiya Velikogo, episkopa Aleksandriiskogo [The life and works of St. Dionysius the Great, Bishop of Alexandria]. St. Petersburg, Oleg Abyshko Publ., 2007, 352 p. (In Russian).

11. Drachmann A. B. Atheism in Pagan Antiquity. London, Gyldendal Publ., 1922, 172 p. (In English).

12. Bullivant S., Ruse, M. The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford, OUP Publ., 2013, 784 p. (In English).

13. Degtyarev D. Yu., priest Meetodologicheskii zamysel ispol’zovaniya ponyatii “elliny”, “evrei”, “khristiane” v traktate Evseviya Kesariiskogo “Evangel’skoe Priugotovlenie” [The methodological idea of using the con‑cepts of “Greeks”, “Jews”, “Christians” in the treatise of Eusebius of Caesarea “Preparation for the Gospel”]. Vestnik Omskoi pravoslavnoi dukhovnoi semi-narii [Bulletin of the Omsk Orthodox Theological Seminary]. 2022, no. 1 (12), pp. 29–38. (In Russian).

14. Johnson A. R. Ethnicity and Argument in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evan‑gelica. New York, Oxford University Press Inc. Publ., 2006, 280 p. (In English).

15. Gallagher E. Eusebius the Apologist: The Evidence of the Preparation and the Proof. Studia Patristica. 1993, no. 26, pp. 251–260. (In English).

16. Young F. Greek Apologists of the Second Century. Apologetics in the Roman Empire Oxford, 1999, pp. 81–104. (In English).

17. Antichnaya filosofiya : entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Ancient philosophy: encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Progress‑ Tradition Publ., 2008, 895 p. (In Russian).

18. Burnet J. Early Greek philosophy. London, Adam & Charles Black Publ., 1920, 389 p. (In English).

19. Bremmer J. N. Atheism in Antiquity. The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge, CUP Publ., 2007, pp. 11–26. (In English).

20. Kazaryan A. T. Ateizm [Atheism]. Pravoslavnaya entsiklopediya [Or‑thodox Encyclopedia]. Moscow, Church‑ Scientific Center “Orthodox Encyclo‑pedia” Publ., 2001, vol. 3, pp. 660–670. (In Russian).

21. Dobrotsvetov P. K. Blazhennyi Feodorit Kirskii (393–466). Lechenie ellinskikh nedugov. Slovo X. Ob istinnykh i lozhnykh orakulakh [Blessed The‑odoret of Cyrus (393–466). Treatment of Hellenic ailments. Word X. About true and false oracles]. Sretenskii sbornik [Sretensky collection]. 2019, no. 9/10, pp. 7–46. (In Russian).

22. Dobrotsvetov P. K. Blazhennyi Feodorit Kirskii. Slovo XII “O deya‑tel’noi dobrodeteli” iz traktata “Lechenie ellinskikh nedugov” [Blessed The‑odoret of Cyrus. Word XII “On active virtue” from the treatise “Treatment of Hellenic ailments”]. DOI: 10.54700/diakrisis.2019.4.4.003 Diakrisia [Di‑acrisis]. 2019, no. 4 (4), pp. 60–83. (In Russian).

23. Dobrotsvetov P. K. Blazhennyi Feodorit Kirskii i ego Slovo IV “O ma‑terii i kosmose” iz traktata “Lechenie ellinskikh nedugov” [Blessed Theodoret of Cyrus and his Word IV “On Matter and Cosmos” from the treatise “Treat‑ment of Hellenic ailments”]. DOI: 10/21638/spbu28.2019.308 Voprosy teologii[Questions of Theology]. 2019, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 441–443. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2024-11-07

Issue

Section

Theology and religious philosophy

Categories

How to Cite

The use of the term “Atheist” (ἄθεος) by bishop Eusebius of Cesaria in the apologetic treatise “Preparation for the Gospel” against Hellenic phylosophy. (2024). Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary , 3 (24), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.51216/2687-072X_2023_3_39-57