Freedom and responsibility in digital reality: an attempt of Orthodox analysis

Authors

  • Anatoly G. Kosichenko, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor Chief Researcher Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Religious Studies Ministry of Science and Higher Education Republic of Kazakhstan Institute of Philosophy, Political Science and Religious Studies of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050010, Almaty, Kurmangazy str., 29 Автор https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9112-8426

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51216/2687-072X_2025_2_14-29

Keywords:

Orthodoxy, good and evil, spiritual essence of man, digital reality, freedom, responsibility, modern world.

Abstract

The subject of the article is the process of digitalization, taken from the side of their worldview and ideological foundations and concretized to the relationship between freedom and responsibility. The purpose of the research is to analyze these foundations from the Orthodox positions in the aspect of the ideological content of digitalization, considered through the prism of the relationship between freedom and responsibility in the digital reality. The relevance of such an analysis is dictated by the growing influence of digitalization on all aspects of personal and social life of a person with the obvious ambiguity of its current tasks and ultimate goals.

The following methods serve as the methodological basis for the study: comparative, which compares the relationship between freedom and responsibility in Orthodoxy with their content in the digital reality; phenomenological, revealing the essence of freedom and responsibility in these areas; axiological, focusing on the value aspects of freedom and responsibility.

It is shown that digitalization and artificial intelligence can have a positive impact on the development of humanity, but only if they remain what they essentially are - just another stage of technological development - and do not claim the status of a new and comprehensive paradigm of global progress. However, digitalization is already claiming the status of a dominant trend of our time.

It is concluded that the worldview and ideological basis of digitalization is trans-humanism and a radical substitution of the spiritual essence of man; at the same time, digitalization negatively affects the spiritual content of human life, reducing the potential for interpersonal communication, primitivizing culture, replacing the creative essence of man with formal behavioral stereotypes. Since the trend towards the expansion of digital reality is universal and cannot be ignored, it should be endowed with at least minimal moral content as much as possible and not allowed to turn into a global challenge for humanity.

For citation: Kosichenko A. G. Freedom and responsibility in digital reality: an attempt of Orthodox analysis DOI: 10.51216/2687-072Х_2025_2_14-29. EDN: RWRLNY // Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary. 2025, no. 2 (31). P. 14-29. (In Russian)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Список источников

1. Бостром Н. Сознание - это счисление : [беседа со шведским философом] / вел Михаил Карпов // Лента.ру : сайт. URL: https://lenta.ru/articles/2018/07/31/bostrom/ (дата обращения: 20.07.2024).

2. Сачков Д. Деньги-Власть-Деньги: История и Цели Мiровой Власти // LiveLib : сайт. URL: https://www.livelib.ru/book/8706214/editions/ (дата обращения: 20.07.2024).

3. Стиглер Б. Упраздненный индивид. Неудобство культуры в эпоху психической и социальной дезиндивидуации // Лаканалия : сетевой психоаналитический журнал. URL: http://www.lacan.ru/journals/23-2017-protez/bernar-stigler-uprazdnennyj-individ-neudobstvo-kultury-v-epohu-psihicheskoj-i-sotsialnoj-dezindividuatsii/ (дата обращения: 09.10.2023).

4. Четверикова О. Н. Цифровой тоталитаризм. Как это делается в России. Москва : Книжный мир, 2022. 400 с.

Список литературы

1. Аверкий (Таушев), архиеп. Современность в свете Слова Божия. Москва : Институт русской цивилизации, 2012. 713 с.

2. Бердяев Н. А. Философия свободы. Харьков : Фолио ; Москва : АСТ, 2002. 736 с.

3. Григорий Богослов, свт. Творения. В 2 т. Т. 1. Москва : Сибирская Благозвонница, 2007. 895 с. (Полное собрание творений святых отцов Церкви и церковных писателей в русском переводе ; т. 1).

4. Иоанн Златоуст, свт. Беседы на псалмы. Беседа на 109 псалом // Творения святого отца нашего Иоанна Златоуста, архиепископа Константинопольского в русском переводе : в 12 т. [Почаев] : Свято-Успенская Почаевская Лавра, 2005. Т. 5. С. 288-305.

5. Косиченко А. Г. Сущность человека в Православии. EDN: GRBPUU // Богословский сборник Тамбовской духовной семинарии. 2024. № 2 (27). С. 38-55.

6. Леонов В., прот. Цифровая трансформация в жизни современного общества: религиозный аспект // Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Социальная и экономическая психология. 2021. Т. 6, № 2 (22). С. 35-68.

7. Лосский В. Н. Очерк мистического богословия Восточной Церкви. Догматическое богословие / пер. с фр. мон. Магдалины (В. А. Рещиковой). 2-е изд., испр. и перераб. Сергиев Посад : Свято-Троицкая Сергиева Лавра, 2012. 586 с.

8. Никодим Святогорец, прп. Невидимая брань / пер. с греч. святителя Феофана Затворника. Москва : Правило веры, 2002. 443 с.

List of Sources

1. Bostrom N. Soznanie - eto schislenie [Consciousness is a numeration]. Sait Lenta.ru [Lenta.ru Website]. (In Russian). Available at: https://lenta.ru/articles/2018/07/31/bostrom/ (accessed: 20.07.2024).

2. Sachkov D. Den’gi-Vlast’-Den’gi: Istoriya i Tseli Mirovoi Vlasti [Money-Power-Money: History and Goals of World Power]. Sait LiveLib [LiveLib Website]. (In Russian). Available at: https://www.livelib.ru/book/8706214/editions/ (accessed: 20.07.2024).

3. Stiegler B. Uprazdnennyi individ. Neudobstvo kul’tury v epokhu psikhicheskoi i sotsial’noi dezindividualizatsii [The abolished individual. The inconvenience of culture in the era of mental and social disindividuation]. Setevoi Psikhoanaliticheskii Zhurnal: Lakanaliya [Online Psychoanalytic Journal Lacanalia]. (In Russian). Available at: http://www.lacan.ru/journals/23-2017-protez/bernar-stigler-uprazdnennyj-individ-neudobstvo-kultury-v-epohu-psihicheskoj-i-sotsialnoj-dezindividuatsii/ (accessed: 09.10.2023).

4. Chetverikova O. N. Tsifrovoi totalitarizm. Kak eto delaetsya v Rossii [Digital totalitarianism. How it is done in Russia]. Moscow, Knizhny Mir Publ., 2022, 400 p. (In Russian).

References

1. Averky (Taushev), Archbishop Sovremennost’ v svete Slova Bozhiya [Modernity in the light of the word of God]. Moscow, Institute of Russian Civilization Publ., 2012, 713 p. (In Russian).

2. Berdyaev N. A. Filosofiya svobody [Philosophy of Freedom]. Kharkov, Folio, Moscow, AST Publ., 2002, 736 p. (In Russian).

3. Saint Gregory the Theologian Tvoreniya [Writings]. Moscow, Siberian Blagozvonnitsa Publ., 2007, vol.1, 895 p. (In Russian).

4. Saint John Chrysostom Besedy na psalmy. Beseda na 109 psalom [Talks on the Psalms. A talk on Psalm 109]. Tvoreniya svyatogo ottsa nashego Ioanna Zlatousta, arkhiepiskopa Konstantinopol’skogo v russkom perevode [Writings of our Holy Father John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople in Russian translation]. Pochaev, Holy Dormition Pochaev Lavra Publ., 2005, vol. 5, pp. 288-305. (In Russian).

5. Kosichenko A. G. Sushchnost’ cheloveka v Pravoslavii [The essence of man in Orthodoxy]. EDN: GRBPUU Bogoslovskii sbornik Tambovskoi dukhovnoi seminarii [Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary]. 2024, no. 2 (27), pp. 38-55. (In Russian).

6. Leonov V., Archpriest Tsifrovaya transformatsiya v zhizni sovremennogo obshchestva: religioznyi aspect [Digital transformation in the life of modern society: religious aspect]. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Social and Economic Psychology]. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2021, vol. 6, no. 2 (22), pp. 35-68. (In Russian).

7. Lossky V. N. Ocherk misticheskogo bogosloviya Vostochnoi Tserkvi. Dogmaticheskoe bogoslovie [An essay of the mystical theology of the Eastern Church. Dogmatic Theology]. Sergiev Posad, Holy Trinity Lavra of St. Sergius Publ., 2012, 586 p. (In Russian).

8. Venerable Nicodemus of the Holy Mountain Nevidimaya bran’ [Invisible Warfare]. Moscow, Rule of Faith Publ., 2002, 443 p. (In Russian).

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

Issue

Section

Theology and religious philosophy

How to Cite

Freedom and responsibility in digital reality: an attempt of Orthodox analysis. (2025). Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary , 2 (31), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.51216/2687-072X_2025_2_14-29

Most read articles by the same author(s)