Archpriest Georgy Florovsky and V.S. Solovyov in the struggle for history

Authors

  • Georgiy V. Pautov, Master of Theology PhD Student Faculty of Theology Orthodox St. Tikhon’s Humanitarian University St. Tikhon's Orthodox University for the Humanities, Likhov Lane, 6, building 1, 127051, Moscow, Russia Автор https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5798-3907

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51216/

Keywords:

moving force of history, Solovyov’s historiosophy, Florovsky’s religious and historical thought, Danilevsky’s theory, criticism of Slavophilism, Eurasianism ideology

Abstract

The article identifies an urgent problem associated with the absence in the content of G. V. Florovsky’s famous book “The Ways of Russian Theology” of a rather noticeable event in the history of Russian religious and philosophical  thought - the polemic between V. S. Solovyov and N. Y. Danilevsky, which arose in the second half of the 19th century. The ambiguity of the situation is emphasized, since Florovsky was obviously familiar with this event, as indicated by the presence of Solovyov’s connotations in his works of the period 1921–1928, dedicated to the criticism of the historiosophical ideas of Slavophilism and Eurasianism. To substantiate this thesis: the formation of the axial thought of Florovsky’s historiosophy is traced; the relationship between the main provisions of Florovsky and Solovyov’s criticism of Danilevsky’s theory of cultural-­historical types and the historiosophy of the Slavophiles A.S. Khomyakov, I.V. Kireevsky, I.S. Aksakov and M.N. Katkov is considered with a view to their convergence. It is substantiated that: the axial thought of Florovsky’s historiosophy is the idea of Christianity as the main driving force of history, and this idea is formulated based on Solovyov’s historicism and can be traced in Florovsky’s works written in the period 1921–1928. It is concluded that Florovsky, already at an early stage of his work, turned to Solovyov’s ideas and was well acquainted with the peculiarities of his polemic with Danilevsky. Assumptions have been put forward and reasoned that: renouncing Solovyov’s legacy, Florovsky decided not to cover the controversy with Danilevsky in “Ways of Russian Theology” in order to avoid indirect indications of conceptual dependence on the philosopher’s ideas. Florovsky did the same with Eurasian ideology, about which he did not leave even a hint in his main work (this, naturally, also affected Danilevsky). 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Громов, М. Н. Идейные течения древнерусской мысли / М. Н. Громов, В. В. Мильков. – Санкт-Петербург : РХГИ, 2001. – 960 c. – ISBN 5-88812-097-9.

2. Ефремов, А. В. Борьба за историю: концепция Н. Я. Данилевского в оценке современников / А. В. Ефремов. – Москва : Пашков дом, 2006. – 168 с. – ISBN 5-7510-0352-7.

3. Максимов, М. В. Историософия Вл. Соловьева в отечественной и зарубежной философской мысли ХХ в. : специальность 09.00.03 «История философии» : диссертация на соискание ученой степени доктора философских наук / Максимов Михаил Викторович ; Московский педагогический государственный университет. – Москва, 1999. – 401 с.

4. Малинов, А. В. Философия истории В. С. Соловьева / А. В. Малинов // Минувшее и непреходящее в жизни и творчестве В. С. Соловьева : материалы международной конференции, 14–15 февраля 2003 г. – Санкт-Петербург : Санкт-Петербургское философское общество, 2003. – (Symposium ; вып. 32). – ISBN 5-93597-058-9. – C. 104–141.

5. Navickas J. L. Hegel and the Doctrine of Historicity of Vladimir Solovyov // The Quest for the Absolute. – The Hague, 1966. – P. 135–154.

6. Максимов, М. В. Вл. Соловьев и Гегель : (к анализу философско-исторических воззрений) / М. В. Максимов // Соловьевские исследования. – Иваново : Ивановский государственный энергетический университет, 2001. – Вып. 3 (3). – ISBN 589482-89-8. – С. 5–19.

7. Холодов, Р. Н. Метафизическое значение человечества в историософии Вл. Соловьева / Р. Н. Холодов // Соловьевские исследования. – Иваново : Ивановский государственный энергетический университет имени В. И. Ленина, 2004. – Вып. 1 (8). – ISBN 5-89482-304-8. – С. 183–193.

8. Бажов, С.И. Философия истории Н.Я. Данилевского : [монография] / С. И. Бажов. – Москва : Институт философии Российской академии наук, 1997. – 215 с. – ISBN 5-201-01922-6.

9. Аксенова, Е. П. Славянская идея в русской философской мысли : (В.С. Соловьев, Н. А. Бердяев, Г. В. Флоровский) / Е. П. Аксенова // Славянский альманах-2000. –Москва : Индрик, 2001. –ISBN 5-85759-157-6. – С. 152–167.

10. Щученко, В. А. Флоровский как представитель конкретного историзма / В.А. Щученко // Георгий Васильевич Флоровский. – Москва : Политическая энциклопедия, 2014. – ISBN 978-5-8243-1982-8. – С. 142–156.

11. Байссвенгер, М. Флоровский и евразийство / М. Байссвенгер // Георгий Васильевич Флоровский. – Москва : Политическая энциклопедия, 2014. – ISBN 978-5-8243-1982-8 – С. 66–79.

12. Хоружий, С. С. Россия, Евразия и отец Георгий Флоровский / С. С. Хоружий // Начала. – 1991. – № 3. – С. 22–30.

REFERENCES

1. Gromov M. N. Ideinye techeniya drevnerusskoi mysli [Ideological trends of ancient Russian thought]. St. Petersburg, RKhGI Publ., 2001, 960 p. (In Russian).

2. Efremov A. V. Bor’ba za istoriyu: kontseptsiya N. Ya. Danilevskogo v otsenke sovremennikov [The struggle for history: the concept of N. Ya. Danilevsky in the assessment of contemporaries]. Moscow, Pashkov House Publ., 2006, 168 p. (In Russian).

3. Maksimov M. V. Istoriosofiya V. Solovyeva v otechestvennoi i zarubezhnoi filosofskoi mysli XX v. diss. dokt. filosof. nauk [V. Solovyev’s historiosophy in domestic and foreign philosophical thought of the twentieth century. Doc. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 1999, 401 p. (In Russian).

4. Malinov A. V. Filosofiya istorii V. S. Solovyeva [Philosophy of history of V. S. Solovyev]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Minuvshee i neprekhodyashchee v zhizni i tvorchestve V.S. Solovyeva” [Proceeedings of the International Conference “Past and Enduring in the Life and Work of V. S. Solovyev]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg Philosophical Society Publ., 2003, pp. 104–141. (In Russian).

5. Navickas J. L. Hegel and the Doctrine of Historicity of Vladimir Solovyov. The Quest for the Absolute. The Hague, 1966, pp. 135–154. (In English).

6. Maksimov M. V. Vl. Solovyev i Gegel’ [Vl. Solovyov and Hegel]. Solovievskie issledovaniya [Solovyov Studies]. Ivanovo, Ivanovo State Energy University Publ., 2001, issue 3 (3), pp. 5–19. (In Russian).

7. Kholodov R. N. Metafizicheskoe znachenie chelovechestva v istoriosofii Vl. Solovyeva [The metaphysical significance of humanity in the historiosophy of Vl. Solovyov]. Solovievskie issledovaniya [Solovyev Studies]. Ivanovo, Ivanovo State Energy University named after V.I. Lenin Publ., 2004, issue 1 (8), pp. 183–193. (In Russian).

8. Bazhov S. I. Filosofiya istorii N. Ya. Danilevskogo [Philosophy of history of N. Ya. Danilevsky]. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 1997, 215 p. (In Russian).

9. Aksenova E.P. Slavyanskaya ideya v russkoi filosofskoi mysli [Slavic idea in Russian philosophical thought]. Slavyanskii al’manakh-2000 [Slavic Almanac-2000]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2001, pp. 152–167. (In Russian).

10. Schuchenko V. A. Florovsky kak predstavtel’ konkretnogo istorizma [Florovsky as a representative of concrete historicism]. Georgy Vasil’evich Florovsky [Georgy Vasilyevich Florovsky]. Moscow, Political Encyclopedia Publ., 2014, pp. 142–156. (In Russian).

11. Beissvenger M. Florovsky i evraziistvo [Florovsky and Eurasianism]. Georgy Vasil’evich Florovsky [Georgy Vasilyevich Florovsky]. Moscow, Political Encyclopedia Publ., 2014, pp. 66–79. (In Russian).

12. Khoruzhy S. S. Rossia, Evrazia i otets Georgy Florovsky [Russia, Eurasia and Father Georgy Florovsky]. Nachala [Beginnings]. 1991, no. 3, pp. 22–30. (In Russian).

Downloads

Published

2024-09-25

Issue

Section

Theology and religious philosophy

Categories

How to Cite

Archpriest Georgy Florovsky and V.S. Solovyov in the struggle for history. (2024). Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary , 3 (28), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.51216/