Secular pseudo-criticism of religious worldview as a factor of existential and social instability. Part 2.
Keywords:
religious enlightenment, religious illiteracy, secular and religious consciousness, materialism and atheism, Orthodoxy, existential and social sustainability, key issue of philosophyAbstract
The centuries-old debate between secular and religious consciousness, originating in the era of secularism and continuing in post-secular times, undoubtedly acts as a destabilizing factor in modern social development, which determines the relevance of the research undertaken. The object of the study is pseudo-criticism of religious ideas from the secular, or non-religious, worldview. The subject of the study is public religious enlightenment and education, the acute lack of which, in comparison, for example, with scientific enlightenment and education, is clearly felt in modern Russian society. The purpose of the work is to present criticism of religious consciousness from the secular system of ideological coordinates as pseudo-criticism and to substantiate religious enlightenment and education as an essential condition and factor for the sustainable development of man and society. Research methods are social and pedagogical observation, comparative analysis, thought experiment, empirical generalization, deductive and inductive conclusions and inferences by analogy. This article is the second part of the work, which examines such pseudo-secular misconceptions, according to which 1) the believer’s hope for salvation can be regarded as a pragmatic motive; 2) the religious worldview, unlike the secular one, is not coherent; 3) Christian providentialism can be viewed as a type of fatalism; 4) the suffering and disasters of man and society “indicate” the non-existence of the supernatural world in its personal understanding and dimension; 5) the religious worldview is, in fact, non-social, or asocial, and therefore cannot be the basis of a national idea. The result of the work is the presentation and justification of comprehensive religious education and public education as one of the valid and effective means of existential and social sustainability. The scope of application of the research results is multifaceted educational, cultural and socio-political interactions.
Downloads
References
1. Гусев, Д. А. Секулярная псевдокритика религиозного мировоззрения как фактор экзистенциальной и социальной неустойчивости. Часть 1 / Гусев Дмитрий Алексеевич. – EDN: SMNNBB // Богословский сборник Тамбовской духовной семинарии. – 2024. – № 1 (26). – С. 14–38.
2. Гусев, Д. А. Православие и национальная идея, или От личного изменения к преобразованию общества / Гусев Дмитрий Алексеевич, Потатуров Василий Александрович, Суслов Алексей Викторович. – DOI: 10.51216/2687-072Х_2023_3_14. EDN: HRCTAY // Богословский сборник Тамбовской духовной семинарии. – 2023. – № 3 (24). – С. 14–38.
3. Злобин А. Н., свящ. Соработничество человека и Бога в контексте сотериологического учения Православной Церкви / священник Алексей Николаевич Злобин. – EDN: UXYMHC // Богословский сборник Тамбовской духовной семинарии. – 2024. – № 1 (26). – С. 39–55.
4. Зима, В. Н. К вопросу об общих принципах постановки и решения проблемы онтологического статуса свободы воли (в контексте современных дискуссий) / В. Н. Зима // Философия и культура. – 2018. – № 11. – С. 20–37.
5. Гумницкий, Г. Н. Понятие свободы: детерминизм или индетерминизм? / Г. Н. Гумницкий // Информационная среда вуза. – 2017. – № 1 (24). – С. 252–256.
6. Феодосий (Васнев), митр. Святоотеческое учение о человеке и цивилизационный выбор России / митрополит Тамбовский и Рассказовский Феодосий (Васнев Сергей Иванович). – DOI: 10.51216/2687-072Х_2023_1_14. EDN: LOUMAG. EDN: RRKZZN // Богословский сборник Тамбовской духовной семинарии. – 2023. – № 1 (22). – С. 14–30.
7. Осипов, А. И. Бог / А. И. Осипов. – 4-е изд. – Москва : Православное братство св. апостола Иоанна Богослова, 2014. – 104 с. : ил. – ISBN 978-5-89424-143-2.
8. Биленко, Т. И. Героизм и подвижничество: проблема выбора // Булгаковские чтения / Т. И. Биленко. – 2007. – № 1. – С. 184–189.
9. Булгаков, С. Н. Героизм и подвижничество (из размышлений о религиозной природе русской интеллигенции) / С. Н. Булгаков // Христианский социализм / С. Н. Булгаков. – Новосибирск : Наука, 1991. – С. 138–178.
10. Гусев, Д. А. «Основной вопрос философии» в контексте полемики теизма и атеизма как систем мировоззренческой навигации человека (историко-философский и общетеоретический аспекты) / Д. А. Гусев. – DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2020-6-58-68 // Вопросы философии. – 2020. – № 6. – С. 58–68.
REFERENCES
1. Gusev D.A. Sekulyarnaya psevdokritika religioznogo mirovozzreniya kak faktor ekzistentsial’noi i sotsial’noi neustoichivosti. Chast’ 1 [Secular
pseudo-criticism of religious worldview as a factor of existential and social instability. Part 1]. EDN: SMNNBB Bogoslovskii sbornik Tambovskoi
dukhovnoi seminarii [Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary]. 2024, no. 1 (26), pp. 14–38. (In Russian).
2. Gusev D.A. Pravoslavie i natsional’naya ideya, ili Ot lichnogo izmeneniya k preobrazovaniyu obshchestva [Orthodoxy and the national idea,
or From personal change to the transformation of society]. EDN: HRCTAY Bogoslovskii sbornik Tambovskoi dukhovnoi seminarii [Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary]. 2023, no. 3 (24), pp. 14–38. (In Russian).
3. Zlobin A.N., Priest Sorabotnichestvo cheloveka i Boga v kontekste soteriologicheskogo ucheniya Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi [Cooperation between man and God in the context of soteriological teaching of the Orthodox Church]. EDN: UXYMHC Bogoslovskii sbornik Tambovskoi dukhovnoi seminarii [Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary]. 2024, no. 1 (26), pp. 39–55. (In Russian).
4. Zima V.N. K voprosu ob obshchikh printsipakh postanovki i resheniya problem ontologichskogo statusa svobody i voli (v kontekste sovremennykh diskussii [On the question of the general principles of posing and solving the problem of the ontological status of free will (in the context of modern discussions)]. Filosofiya i kul’tura [Philosophy and Culture]. 2018, no. 11, pp. 20–37. (In Russian).
5. Gumnitsky G.N. Ponyatie svobody: determinizm ili indeterminizm? [The concept of freedom: determinism or indeterminism?]. Informatsionnaya sreda vuza [Information Environment of the University]. 2017, no. 1 (24), pp. 252–256. (In Russian).
6. Feodosy (Vasnev), Metropolitan Svyatootecheskoe uchenie o cheloveke i tsivilizatsionnyi vybor Rossii [Patristic doctrine of man and civilizational choice of Russia]. EDN: LOUMAG. EDN: RRKZZN Bogoslovskii sbornik Tambovskoi dukhovnoi seminarii [Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary]. 2023, no. 1 (22), pp. 14–30. (In Russian).
7. Osipov A.I. Bog [God]. Moscow, Orthodox Brotherhood of St. Apostle John the Theologian Publ., 2014, 104 p. (In Russian).
8. Bilenko T.I. Geroizm i podvizhnichestvo: problema vybora [Heroism and asceticism: the problem of choice]. Bulgakovskie chteniya [Bulgakov Readings]. 2007, no. 1, pp. 184–189. (In Russian).
9. Bulgakov S.N. Geroizm i podvizhnichestvo (iz razmyshlenii o religioznoi prirode russkoi intelligentsii) [Heroism and asceticism (from reflections on the religious nature of the Russian intelligentsia)]. Khristianskii sotsiolizm [Christian Socialism]. Novosibirsk, Science Publ., 1991, pp. 138–178. (In Russian).
10. Gusev D.A. “Osnovnoi vopros filosofii” v kontekste polemiki teizma i ateizma kak systemy mirovozrencheskoi navigatsii cheloveka (istoriko-filosofskii i obshcheteoreticheskie aspekty) [“The main issue of philosophy” in the context of the polemics of theism and atheism as systems of human ideological navigation (historical, philosophical and general theoretical aspects)]. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy]. 2020, no. 6, pp. 58‒68. (In Russian).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Theological Collection of Tambov Theological Seminary
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
